tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1349290550527925310.post8893855507615741682..comments2024-03-19T14:51:21.425-04:00Comments on The Trad: Fortune Magazine & 1954's Clothing Markettintinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13652066200071703445noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1349290550527925310.post-87302080510558498542013-11-08T21:43:03.985-05:002013-11-08T21:43:03.985-05:00You must be new around here,Donald. You must be new around here,Donald. tintinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13652066200071703445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1349290550527925310.post-63776817255884454862013-11-08T15:38:40.090-05:002013-11-08T15:38:40.090-05:00So where are the details?So where are the details?Donaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17885899797053388360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1349290550527925310.post-1444063859467926532013-10-25T11:00:07.963-04:002013-10-25T11:00:07.963-04:00I bet they owned far fewer 100% cotton-content pan...I bet they owned far fewer 100% cotton-content pants, excepting of course their ubiquitous and humble rumpled twill khaki yard work trousers. <br /><br />Real men's pants back then had that rarest of qualities: drape.<br /><br />Love that cover design.<br /><br />-DBAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com